We use cookies. Cookies and browser storage keep you signed in and remember your preferences. With your permission we also measure how the site is used. You can any time. See our cookie policy.

LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

A side-by-side comparison of LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B ($1.22 / 1M tokens) and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($1.26 / 1M tokens) using current USD prices and capabilities from the api14 catalog. Both run through the same OpenAI-compatible API.

Specifications

LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
ProviderLiquidAIQwen
Input$1.22 / 1M tokens$1.26 / 1M tokens
Output$1.75 / 1M tokens$1.40 / 1M tokens
Cache read$0.14 / 1M tokens-
Context window128,00032,768
Max output8,19216,384
Inputtexttext
Outputtexttext
Tool calling
Structured output
Reasoning control
AddedAug 11, 2026Sep 19, 2024

Key differences

  • Both have about the same input price.
  • Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 20% cheaper on output tokens.
  • LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B reads 3.9× more context (128,000 tokens).
  • Only LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B supports reasoning effort control.
  • A request with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens costs $0.00210 with LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B and $0.00196 with Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

Switch with one string

Both models use the same endpoint and request shape. Change the model value from "liquid/lfm-2.5-2.6b" to "qwen/qwen-2.5-72b-instruct" and prompts, streaming and tools keep working.

import OpenAI from "openai";

const client = new OpenAI({
  baseURL: "https://api14.com/api/v1",
  apiKey: process.env.API14_API_KEY,
});

const result = await client.chat.completions.create({
  "model": "qwen/qwen-2.5-72b-instruct",
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "Explain vector databases in two sentences."
    }
  ]
});
console.log(result.choices[0].message.content);

More comparisons