LiquidAI: LFM3-1.7B vs Reka Flash 3
A side-by-side comparison of LiquidAI: LFM3-1.7B ($0.28 / 1M tokens) and Reka Flash 3 ($0.35 / 1M tokens) using current USD prices and capabilities from the api14 catalog. Both run through the same OpenAI-compatible API.
Specifications
| LiquidAI: LFM3-1.7B | Reka Flash 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | LiquidAI | Reka AI |
| Input | $0.28 / 1M tokens | $0.35 / 1M tokens |
| Output | $0.70 / 1M tokens | $0.70 / 1M tokens |
| Cache read | $0.07 / 1M tokens | - |
| Context window | 262,144 | 65,536 |
| Max output | 8,192 | 58,982 |
| Input | text | text |
| Output | text | text |
| Tool calling | ||
| Structured output | ||
| Reasoning control | ||
| Added | Nov 6, 2026 | Mar 12, 2025 |
Key differences
- LiquidAI: LFM3-1.7B is 20% cheaper on input tokens.
- LiquidAI: LFM3-1.7B reads 4.0× more context (262,144 tokens).
- Only LiquidAI: LFM3-1.7B supports tool calling.
- A request with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens costs $0.000630 with LiquidAI: LFM3-1.7B and $0.000700 with Reka Flash 3.
Switch with one string
Both models use the same endpoint and request shape. Change the model value from "liquid/lfm-3-1.7b" to "rekaai/reka-flash-3" and prompts, streaming and tools keep working.
import OpenAI from "openai";
const client = new OpenAI({
baseURL: "https://api14.com/api/v1",
apiKey: process.env.API14_API_KEY,
});
const result = await client.chat.completions.create({
"model": "rekaai/reka-flash-3",
"messages": [
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Explain vector databases in two sentences."
}
]
});
console.log(result.choices[0].message.content);
More comparisons
- LiquidAI: LFM3-1.7B vs Ricursive: Ripple 65B Preview
- LiquidAI: LFM3-1.7B vs Crouton Alpha
- LiquidAI: LFM3-1.7B vs Tencent: Hy4
- LiquidAI: LFM3-1.7B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal
- Ricursive: Ripple 65B Preview vs Crouton Alpha
- Ricursive: Ripple 65B Preview vs Tencent: Hy4
- Ricursive: Ripple 65B Preview vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal
- Crouton Alpha vs Tencent: Hy4