We use cookies. Cookies and browser storage keep you signed in and remember your preferences. With your permission we also measure how the site is used. You can any time. See our cookie policy.

Google: Nano Banana 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo

A side-by-side comparison of Google: Nano Banana 2.1 ($5.25 / 1M tokens) and Qwen: Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo ($0.06 / image) using current USD prices and capabilities from the api14 catalog. Both run through the same OpenAI-compatible API.

Specifications

Google: Nano Banana 2.1Qwen: Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo
ProviderGoogleQwen
Input$5.25 / 1M tokens-
Output$26.25 / 1M tokens-
Image output$105.00 / 1M tokens$0.06 / image
Web search$49.00 / 1K searches-
Context window65,53665,536
Max output58,98258,982
Inputimage, texttext, image
Outputimage, textimage
Tool calling
Structured output
Reasoning control
AddedOct 6, 2026Oct 16, 2026

Key differences

  • Only Google: Nano Banana 2.1 supports tool calling.
  • Only Google: Nano Banana 2.1 supports structured JSON output.
  • Only Google: Nano Banana 2.1 supports reasoning effort control.

Switch with one string

Both models use the same endpoint and request shape. Change the model value from "google/gemini-nano-banana-2.1" to "qwen/qwen-image-2.1-turbo" and prompts, streaming and tools keep working.

import OpenAI from "openai";

const client = new OpenAI({
  baseURL: "https://api14.com/api/v1",
  apiKey: process.env.API14_API_KEY,
});

const result = await client.images.generate({
  "model": "qwen/qwen-image-2.1-turbo",
  "prompt": "A minimalist product photo of a ceramic mug on a wooden table",
  "n": 1,
  "aspect_ratio": "1:1"
});
import { writeFile } from "node:fs/promises";
await writeFile("image.png", Buffer.from(result.data[0].b64_json, "base64"));

More comparisons